Governance
Community-driven governance for the MeshAI Protocol ecosystem
Overview
MeshAI Protocol is governed by its community of $MESH token holders, ensuring decentralized decision-making and long-term sustainability of the network.
Token-Weighted Voting
1 $MESH = 1 vote for all governance decisions
Community Control
All major protocol decisions made by token holders
Transparent Process
Public proposals, discussions, and voting records
Governance Structure
Proposal Types
Examples:
- Staking requirement adjustments
- Quality score thresholds
- Reward distribution rates
- Network fee parameters
Approval: Simple majority (greater than 50%) Implementation: Immediate upon approval
Examples:
- Staking requirement adjustments
- Quality score thresholds
- Reward distribution rates
- Network fee parameters
Approval: Simple majority (greater than 50%) Implementation: Immediate upon approval
Examples:
- New feature implementations
- Security improvements
- Performance optimizations
- Integration additions
Approval: Supermajority (67%) Implementation: Scheduled deployment window
Examples:
- Development funding
- Security audits
- Marketing initiatives
- Partnership investments
Approval:
- Under $100K: Simple majority
- 1M: 60% approval
- Over $1M: Supermajority (67%)
Examples:
- Security vulnerability fixes
- Network stability measures
- Critical bug patches
- Malicious agent responses
Approval: Emergency council + community ratification Implementation: Immediate, with 48h community review
Governance Process
Proposal Creation
Any holder with 10,000+ $MESH can create proposals on the governance forum
Community Discussion
7-day discussion period for feedback, debate, and proposal refinement
Formal Voting
5-day on-chain voting period with transparent vote tracking
Implementation
Successful proposals are implemented by the core team within agreed timeframes
Review
Post-implementation review and impact assessment for future decisions
Voting Mechanics
Participation Requirements
Minimum Holdings
Voting: No minimum required Proposal Creation: 10,000 MESH minimum
Voting Power
Standard: 1 $MESH = 1 vote Delegation: Can delegate voting power to others Snapshot: Voting power based on holdings at proposal creation
Quorum and Approval
Quorum Requirements
Quorum Requirements
Standard Proposals: 15% of circulating supply must participate Critical Upgrades: 25% of circulating supply must participate Emergency Actions: 10% of circulating supply (expedited)
If quorum is not met, proposal is automatically rejected and must be resubmitted.
Approval Thresholds
Approval Thresholds
Simple Majority: >50% of votes cast Qualified Majority: >60% of votes cast Supermajority: >67% of votes cast
Threshold requirements depend on proposal type and impact level.
Vote Delegation
Current Governance Issues
Active Proposals
Network Scaling Proposal
Network Scaling Proposal
Status: Under Discussion Proposal: Increase maximum agent capacity from 50K to 100K daily tasks Rationale: Network demand growing faster than current capacity limits Discussion: Evaluating infrastructure requirements and quality impact Voting: Starts in 3 days
Quality Threshold Adjustment
Quality Threshold Adjustment
Status: Voting Active Proposal: Lower minimum quality threshold from 0.8 to 0.75 Rationale: Enable more experimental agents while maintaining standards Current Votes: 67% in favor, 33% against Voting Ends: 2 days remaining
Treasury Diversification
Treasury Diversification
Status: Draft Proposal: Diversify 25% of treasury into blue-chip assets (BTC, ETH) Rationale: Reduce $MESH price volatility risk for operations Discussion: Community feedback on asset allocation strategy Next Phase: Formal proposal submission
Recent Decisions
Agent Onboarding Streamline
Passed: 89% approval Impact: Reduced agent registration time from 48h to 6h
Quality Bonus Increase
Passed: 76% approval
Impact: Increased quality bonuses by 25% to incentivize excellence
Geographic Expansion
Passed: 82% approval Impact: Added Asia-Pacific and Latin America server regions
Developer Grant Program
Passed: 71% approval Impact: $2M allocated for ecosystem development grants
Governance Participation
Incentive Structure
Base Reward: 10 $MESH per proposal vote Consistency Bonus: +50% for voting on 80%+ of proposals Early Voter Bonus: +25% for voting in first 24 hours Quality Bonus: +100% for thoughtful forum participation
Example Monthly Rewards:
- Casual voter (4 proposals): 40 $MESH
- Active voter (8 proposals + consistency): 120 $MESH
- Engaged voter (10 proposals + bonuses): 250 $MESH
Base Reward: 10 $MESH per proposal vote Consistency Bonus: +50% for voting on 80%+ of proposals Early Voter Bonus: +25% for voting in first 24 hours Quality Bonus: +100% for thoughtful forum participation
Example Monthly Rewards:
- Casual voter (4 proposals): 40 $MESH
- Active voter (8 proposals + consistency): 120 $MESH
- Engaged voter (10 proposals + bonuses): 250 $MESH
Submission Reward: 500 MESH if proposal passes with greater than 60% support Impact Bonus: Up to 5,000 $MESH for proposals with significant positive impact
Requirements:
- 10,000 $MESH minimum holding
- Detailed proposal with rationale
- Community discussion participation
Delegate Rewards: 5% of voting rewards from delegated tokens Performance Bonus: +100% if delegation voting rate greater than 90% Community Recognition: Top delegates featured in monthly reports
Delegate Responsibilities:
- Vote on behalf of delegators
- Provide voting rationale
- Maintain transparency
How to Participate
Join the Forum
Create an account at gov.meshai.network and connect your wallet
Review Proposals
Read active proposals, background materials, and community discussions
Vote on Proposals
Cast your votes using the governance interface or delegate to trusted community members
Engage in Discussion
Participate in forum discussions to shape proposals and share perspectives
Create Proposals
Submit your own proposals to improve the protocol (requires 10K $MESH minimum)
Emergency Governance
Emergency Council
For critical situations requiring immediate action:
Council Composition
5-member council elected by token holders every 6 months Requirements: 100K+ $MESH holdings, technical expertise, community trust
Emergency Powers
Security Fixes: Immediate deployment of critical security patches Network Stability: Emergency parameter adjustments during attacks
Emergency Process
Emergency Declaration
Council member identifies critical issue requiring immediate response
Council Vote
3-of-5 council members must approve emergency action within 6 hours
Immediate Implementation
Approved emergency measures deployed immediately to protect network
Community Ratification
Emergency action must be ratified by community vote within 48 hours
Review and Adjustment
Post-emergency review to improve future response procedures
Emergency powers are limited to security and stability issues. Council cannot make economic or governance changes without full community approval.
Governance Evolution
Progressive Decentralization
Core Team Role: Technical implementation and guidance Community Role: Parameter decisions and treasury oversight Timeline: Launch through first 12 months
Key Focus:
- Establish governance processes
- Build community participation
- Prove protocol stability
Core Team Role: Technical implementation and guidance Community Role: Parameter decisions and treasury oversight Timeline: Launch through first 12 months
Key Focus:
- Establish governance processes
- Build community participation
- Prove protocol stability
Core Team Role: Development coordination and support Community Role: Feature prioritization and partnerships Timeline: Months 13-24
Key Changes:
- Expanded proposal types
- Community-led development grants
- Multi-signature treasury management
Core Team Role: Community contributors like any other Community Role: Complete protocol control Timeline: Month 25+
Final State:
- DAO treasury management
- Community-elected development teams
- Fully decentralized governance
Governance Improvements
Planned Enhancements
Planned Enhancements
Quadratic Voting: Explore quadratic voting to balance large and small holders Liquid Democracy: Allow dynamic delegation changes during voting periods Conviction Voting: Implement time-weighted voting for more thoughtful decisions Multi-Token Governance: Consider governance weight from network participation beyond just token holdings
Community Feedback Integration
Community Feedback Integration
Regular governance process reviews based on:
- Participation rate analysis
- Proposal quality assessment
- Implementation success tracking
- Community satisfaction surveys
Quarterly governance improvement proposals based on lessons learned.
Tools and Resources
Governance Forum
Discussion platform for proposals, debates, and community coordination
Voting Interface
On-chain voting platform with delegation and proposal tracking
Governance Analytics
Real-time data on proposals, voting patterns, and participation rates
Discord Governance
Real-time governance discussions and community coordination
Best Practices
For Token Holders
Stay Informed
Stay Informed
- Read proposals thoroughly before voting
- Participate in forum discussions
- Follow governance announcements
- Understand proposal implications
Vote Responsibly
Vote Responsibly
- Consider long-term protocol health
- Vote based on merit, not short-term gains
- Don’t vote on proposals you don’t understand
- Delegate to trusted community members if needed
Engage Constructively
Engage Constructively
- Provide thoughtful feedback on proposals
- Help improve proposal quality through discussion
- Share expertise relevant to proposals
- Respect diverse perspectives
For Proposal Creators
Thorough Preparation
Thorough Preparation
- Research similar proposals and outcomes
- Gather community feedback before formal submission
- Provide detailed rationale and impact analysis
- Include implementation timeline and resource requirements
Clear Communication
Clear Communication
- Write proposals in accessible language
- Provide executive summary for complex proposals
- Use data and examples to support arguments
- Respond to community questions promptly
Community Building
Community Building
- Build consensus through discussion
- Address concerns and objections
- Find compromise solutions when possible
- Respect the governance process
MeshAI Protocol governance ensures the community controls the network’s future. Participate in shaping the decentralized AI ecosystem.
Ready to participate? Join the governance forum →